Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 512

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 527

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 534

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 570

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/query.php on line 61

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/r14reme/public_html/wp-includes/http.php on line 61
Remember » Page 10

Page 10

Page 10

Now publishing post-Rapture.
Much as I’d love to voice my views on religious doomsday predictions and those that cast them, I do actually have a subject much closer to my heart to discuss today. That is of course the Guarding Soldier itself.

Of course, I’ve already espoused its storyline connotations and its backstory and symbolism for the characters present. What I’d like to talk about really is how it’s drawn and what it actually means to me.

The Guarding Soldier first appeared on February 25th 2008, on page 40 of Book 1. I’d spent quite a bit of time drawing it beforehand, since I had a fair size buffer at the time and wanted to draw it right as I was already aware of its story significance. And at the time, I was pretty satisfied with it, it was for the time a very complex piece of work for me.

It then appeared in big fashion in page 44 of Book 5, on January 1st 2011, almost 3 years later (though it did have a couple minor appearances inbetween) and in its greatest exposure to date in these past four pages of Book 5: The War Diaries. And in these appearances, whilst I might not have been completely satisfied with what I achieved, the Guarding Soldier still represents a high-point in my recent artistic endeavours.

The Soldier then is perhaps a benchmark of how my art has improved. Its important to me in that fashion because it is a very significant marker of how far I’ve come. The original appearance has a lot of the markers that plague my earlier artworks, with the yellow circle sun, the shading, the clumsy positioning, improper framing, pointed hands, and even in just how the page itself is laid out (though for its time it was still fairly unconventional for me in making pages). These new appearances have everything I’ve learned to date, the Soldier now actually grabs and holds things with properly-contorted digits, his shading (where utilised) is as proper and accurate as it needs to be, and I’ve even drawn a completely new angle from scratch in the final frame of page 9 for its hammer striking the outpost.

Is it perfect? No, there’s still quite a few things I’d like to improve, like that I still cling to existing view angles rather than making new ones and that my shading is few and far between, both largely to save time. But is it good? I like to think so, and I’m generally very critical of my art (generally speaking I still consider myself more a writer than an artist, and I’m just as critical there too).

Were I wisened teacher stood beside a student, gazing upon their easel with this page plotted out on it, I would be pleased of their progress and I would want to see more.

Posted by: Lying

2 Comments »

  1. ?????

    I don’t see it… =(

    Comment by Kumo — May 23, 2011 @ 4:07 am

  2. Hey, very good. This is my first time posting a comment here, but i just read through your archive. Good, good stuff.

    Comment by SamBurke — May 23, 2011 @ 3:22 pm

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>